Role of concentration and kinetic characteristics of rooster’s native ejaculates in sperm cryoresistance formation
https://doi.org/10.52419/issn2782-6252.2026.2.111
Abstract
One of the ways to improve efficiency of artificial insemination in poultry is early selection of males producing sperm with high cryoresistant properties. Initial ejaculate evaluation plays an important role in predicting viability and can serve as basis for developing quality criteria for decryopreserved semen. In our study, which involved roosters (n=139) from 20 breeds and populations, we identified prognostic indicators that allow us to draw conclusions about the functional activity of decryopreserved sperm based on native ejaculate parameters. At sperm concentration of 3.5 billion/ml in native ejaculate after cryopreservation, was observed the highest percentage of gametes with high kinetic parameters (38.12±1.68%). Maximum percentage of decryopreserved spermatozoa with high rates of total motility (37.05±1.03%) was obtained in the case of freezing native sperm samples with total motility above 85%.
About the Authors
A. A. KurochkinRussian Federation
Anton Al. Kurochkin - Junior Researcher, Developmental Biology Laboratory
A. O. Prituzhalova
Russian Federation
Anna Ol. Prituzhalova - Researcher, Developmental Biology Laboratory
T. I. Kuzmina
Russian Federation
Tatyana Iv. Kuzmina - Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor, Chief Researcher, Head of the Developmental Biology Laboratory
References
1. Arif A., Zahoor N, Tang J., Tang M., Dong L., Khan S.Z., Dai G. Cryopreservation strategies for poultry semen: a comprehensive review of techniques and applications. Veterinary sciences. 2025;12:145. doi:10.3390/vetsci12020145.
2. Benesova B., Trefil P. Possibilities for preserving genetic resources in birds. World’s poultry science journal. 2016; 72(3): 629-642. doi.org/10.1017/S0043933916000489
3. Wolkers W. F., Woelders H. O. Cryopreservation and Freeze-Drying Protocols. Methods in molecular biology. 2015. doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-0783-1_16
4. Çiftci H.B., Aygün A. Poultry semen cryopreservation technologies. World’s poultry science Journal. 2018;74(4):699-710. doi:10.1017/S0043933918000673
5. Tselutin K., Seigneurin F., Blesbois E. Comparison of cryoprotectants and methods of cryopreservation of fowl spermatozoa Poultry science. 1999; 78: 586-590. doi:10.1093/ps/78.4.586
6. Sun Y., Li Y., Zong Y., Mehaisen G. M. K., Chen J. Poultry genetic heritage cryopreservation and reconstruction: advancement and future challenges. Journal of animal science and biotechnology.2022; 13(115). doi:10.1186/s40104-022-00768-2
7. Janosikova M., Petricakova M., Ptacek M., Savvulidi F. G., Rychtarova J., Fulka J., New approaches for long-term conservation of rooster spermatozoa. Poultry science. 2023; 102(2). doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102386
8. Zhang L., Sun Y., Jiang C., Sohail T., Sun X., Wang J., Li Y. Damage to mitochondria during the cryopreservation, causing ROS leakage, leading to oxidative stress and decreased quality of Ram sperm. Reproduction in domestic animals. 2024; 59(10). doi: 10.1111/rda.14737
9. Zong Y., Li Y., Sun Y., Han X., Yuan J., Ma L., Ma H., Chen J. Mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase (GOT2) protein as a potential cryodamage biomarker in rooster spermatozoa cryopreservation. Poultry science. 2025; 104(2). doi:10.1016/j.psj.2024.104690.
10. Xue F., Liu Y., Lv Z., Zhang J., Xiong S., Zha L., Liu Z., Shu J. Regulatory effects of differential dietary energy levels on spermatogenesis and sperm motility of yellowfeathered breeder cocks. Frontiers in veterinary science. 2022; 29(9). doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.964620
11. Ayeneshet B., Taye M., Esatu W., Tsefa A. Comparative analysis of semen quality and fertility in diverse rooster breeds: a systematic review. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 2024;80(3):947–975. doi:10.1080/00439339.2024.2338347
12. Madeddu M., Zaniboni L., Marelli S.P., Tognoli C., Belcredito S., Iaffaldano N., Di Iorio M., Cerolini S. Selection of male donors in local chicken breeds to implement the Italian semen cryobank: variability in semen quality, freezability and fertility. Veterinary science. 2024; 11(4):148. doi:10.3390/ vetsci11040148
13. Mohan J., Sharma S. K., Kolluri G. Dhama K. History of artificial insemination in poultry, its components and significance. World’s poultry science journal. 2018; 74(3): 475-488. doi:10.1017/S0043933918000430
14. Duračka M., Benko F., Tvrdá E. Molecular markers: a new paradigm in the prediction of sperm freezability. International journal of molecular sciences. 2023; 24(4): 3379. doi:10.3390/ijms24043379
15. Ezzati M., Shanehbandi D., Hamdi K., Rahbar S., Pashaiasl M. Influence of cryopreservation on structure and function of mammalian spermatozoa: an overview. Cell Tissue Banking. 2020;21(1):1–15. doi:10.1007/s10561-019-09797-0
16. Li Y, Sun Y, Ni A, Tesfay HH, Isa AM, Zong Y, Ma H, Yuan J, Chen J. Factor analysis of semen quality in chicken and its impact on fertility. Animals. 2025;15(13):1906. doi: 10.3390/ani15131906.
17. Shawky M, Fawy A.F., Elomda A.M., Elmenawey M.A., Atta A.M., Abbas A.O., Mehaisen G.M.K. Effect of semen dilution rate and dimethyl acetamide levels on post-thaw motility and fertility parameters of rooster sperm. PLoS One. 2025; 20(10). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0335748
18. Alvarez M., Tamayo-Canul J., Anel E., Boixo J. C., Mata-Campuzano M., Martinez-Pastor F., Anel L., Paz P. Sperm concentration at freezing affects post-thaw quality and fertility of ram semen. Theriogenology. 2012; 77(6):1111-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.10.013
19. Nascimento J., Raphael C. F., Andrade A. F.C., Alonso M. A., Celeghini E. C.C., Arruda R. P. Effects of Sperm Concentration and Straw Volume on Motion Characteristics and Plasma, Acrosomal, and Mitochondrial Membranes of Equine Cryopreserved Spermatozoa. Journal of equine veterinary science. 2008;28(6):351-358. doi:10.1016/j.jevs.2008.04.010
20. Díaz Ruiz E., Delgado Bermejo J. V., Navas González F. J., León Jurado J. M., González Ariza A. Packaging with lower sperm concentrations improves post-thawing quality parameters of rooster semen. Italian journal of animal science. 2025; 24(1):89–100. doi:10.1080/1828051X.2024.2442042
21. Chaithongsri M., Pachamon K., Koedkanmark T., Boonkum W., Duangjinda M., Chankitisakul V. Research note: Effect of sample type, sperm concentration, and storage conditions on malondialdehyde levels in rooster semen. Poultry science. 2026;105(5). doi:10.1016/j.psj.2025.106054.
22. Patricio A., Cruz D.F., Silva J.V., Padrão A., Correia B. R., Korrodi-Gregório L., Ferreira R., Maia N., Almeida S., Lourenc¸ J., Silva V., Fardilha M. Relation between seminal quality and oxidative balance in sperm cell. Acta Urológica Portuguesa. 2016; 33(1):6-15. doi:10.1016/j.acup.2015.10.001
Review
For citations:
Kurochkin A.A., Prituzhalova A.O., Kuzmina T.I. Role of concentration and kinetic characteristics of rooster’s native ejaculates in sperm cryoresistance formation. Legal regulation in veterinary medicine. 2026;(2):111-117. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52419/issn2782-6252.2026.2.111
JATS XML











